Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 241
ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 23-25

Adequacy of annealing duration in reducing the background counts of personnel monitoring TLD cards: A study


1 Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, CTCRS Building, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, India
2 Avanttec Laboratory Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address:
Kshama Srivastava
Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, CTCRS Building, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

A case study was undertaken to resolve the problem of high background counts of annealed TLD cards at one of the TLD Laboratory observed during handling the over exposure report (OER) received from various accredited laboratories for Non-DAE institutions. In order to verify the appropriateness of annealing procedures adopted by the Laboratory, a detailed study was conducted using four sets of cards exposed to various dose levels. It was found that inadequate annealing time than the standardized protocol duration of 4h at 230°C leads to larger standard deviation and enhanced background, which may slowly build up with repeated use and result in rejection of the dosimeter from field use. Hence it is recommended that annealing procedure of TLD cards must be strictly followed as per standardized protocol.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
Next article
Previous article
Table of Contents
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1454    
    Printed102    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded245    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal