Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 204


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9-13  

Studies on radon concentration in aqueous samples at Mysore city, India


1 Department of Studies in Physics, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Studies in Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication6-May-2013

Correspondence Address:
M S Chandrashekara
Department of Studies in Physics, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore - 570 006, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: DAE-BRNS, Government of India., Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: Natural radionuclides are wide spread in air, water, soil, plants and in consequence in the human diet. 222 Ra is the daughter product of 226 Ra which belongs to 238 U radioactive series. Aims: Radon enters the human body through ingestion of water and inhalation. Since alpha emitters are the most dangerous, studies on water containing dissolved radon are very important. Materials and Methods: The activity concentration of 222 Ra has been analyzed in water samples collected from lakes, open wells, drilled wells, taps and rivers in and around Mysore city, Karnataka State, India using radon emanometric technique. Results: The present study shows a wide range of radon concentration in water, which varies from below detection limit to 643.9 BqL -1 with a median of 15.8 BqL -1. An annual effective dose with a median of 0.043 μSv y-1 was estimated from the ingestion of 222 Ra through water. Conclusions: 222 Rn concentration in 80% of bore-well water samples are higher than the maximum acceptable contaminant level of 11.1 BqL -1 as prescribed by the environmental protection agency.

Keywords: Effective dose, emanometry, Mysore, 222 Ra, water


How to cite this article:
Rajesh B M, Chandrashekara M S, Nagaraja P, Paramesh L. Studies on radon concentration in aqueous samples at Mysore city, India. Radiat Prot Environ 2012;35:9-13

How to cite this URL:
Rajesh B M, Chandrashekara M S, Nagaraja P, Paramesh L. Studies on radon concentration in aqueous samples at Mysore city, India. Radiat Prot Environ [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Jun 6];35:9-13. Available from: http://www.rpe.org.in/text.asp?2012/35/1/9/111403


  Introduction Top


222 Ra is a chemically inert, colorless, odorless and radioactive noble gas with a half-life of 3.82 days. Radon is soluble in water and its mole fraction solubility is 2.3 × 10−4 at 15°C and 1.25 × 10−4 at 37°C. The solubility coefficient of radon in water is 0.254 at 20°C and its solubility decreases with an increase in temperature and increases with an increase in pressure. [1] This property allows a high concentration of radon in ground water. Emanation of radon in the soil and water depends on the meteorological conditions like temperature, pressure and wind velocity. [2] Radon concentration is high in groundwater, which is extracted from drill holes and springs flowing through crystalline rocks or uranium rich bedrock. Radon gas can dissolve in groundwater and later be released into the air during normal household activities such as showering, dishwashing and doing laundry. [3],[4] When radon accumulates in indoor air, it can pose an increased health risk. It is a major contributor to the ionizing radiation dose received by the general population. Exposure to waterborne radon may occur by ingestion and inhalation. When inhaled over prolonged periods of time they are capable of causing lung cancer. [5] A study on dissolved radionuclides in aquatic environment gives the key aspect for evaluation and control of exposure to the natural radionuclides.


  Study Area Top


The study area is Mysore city, Karnataka, India which lies between 12°13″-12°25″ N latitude and 76°27″- 76°45″ E longitude, at an altitude of about 767 m amsl [Figure 1] forming a part of the catchment zone of the Cauvery and Kabini rivers. Mysore city has an area of about 89 sq km. A large water reservoir namely Krishnaraja Sagar (KRS) is situated towards northwest of Mysore city and Chamundi hill (1048 m amsl) is situated towards south east of Mysore. The archean rocks of South India are best developed in Mysore region and are made up of schists, gnesis, pegmatites and granites. The soil in Mysore region is red, sandy and loamy in the entire district. Pegmatitic intrusions into the precambrian gneisses and schists have also been found in several areas. The study area consists of a common water-divide zone caused by two rivers, the Cauvery and the Kabini. The thickness of the weathered zone varies between 3 m and 5 m over much of the Mysore region. [6],[7] The drinking water source for most of western and northern part of the city is from the KRS dam through tap water after proper water treatment and large part of the Southern and Eastern region of the city from the Kabini river. Bore well water is supplied through the tap for the region where the river water is not supplied. In some seasons, large part of the city gets the water supply from the drilled bore wells through the tap.
Figure 1: Study area

Click here to view



  Materials and Methods Top


Estimation of 222 Rn activity by emanometry method

About 100 water samples were collected from bore wells, lakes, open wells, tap and rivers at different locations in and around Mysore City. Samples are collected from all the working bore wells and tap waters in such a way that, a minimum of 10 samples are collected in each square kilometre of the study area. Samples are collected from public and few private open wells and in all the lakes in and around the Mysore city. River water samples are collected from KRS (Cauvery river) and Kabini river.

The 222 Rn activity concentration in water samples was estimated by the radon emanometry. [8] Water samples were collected in airtight plastic bottles in a gentle manner to prevent the formation of air bubbles inside the container and also to control the aeration during the water sampling process. The samples were brought to the laboratory with minimal loss of time and were analyzed immediately. In this method, about 70 mL of the water sample was transferred into the 100 mL volume bubbler by the vacuum transfer technique. The scintillation cell was connected to a radon bubbler through rubber tubing, then agitating the water in the bubbler, the dissolved radon gets released and enters into a pre-evacuated and background counted ZnS (Ag) scintillation cell of volume 150 cc. The scintillation cell with collected radon gas was stored for 180 min to allow radon to attain equilibrium with its daughters and then it was coupled to a photomultiplier and programmable alpha counting system. Alpha probe comprises a ZnS (Ag) scintillator, detector coupled to a photomultiplier tube. The instrument is calibrated for the qualitative analysis of low level radon in aqueous samples, hence the calibration is performed using a standard alpha source Am-241 of strength 4260 dpm. The lower detection limit of the instrument is 0.05 BqL -1 . Replicate measurements were done to confirm the experimental values and the concentration was calculated using the following equation (1) [8]



Where, D is difference between background counts and sample counts, V is volume of water (70 mL), E is efficiency of the scintillation cell (74%), λ is decay constant for radon (2.098 × 10 -6 s -1 ), T is counting delay after sampling (s), t is counting duration in (s).

Dose due to 222 Rn concentration in water

The effective dose for an adult who drinks 60 Ly -1 of water was estimated using the sum of dose due to ingestion and inhalation from the concentration of 222 Rn in the water samples. [9] The parameters for the inhalation dose were 222 Rn concentration in water, air water concentration ratio of 10 -4 , indoor occupancy of 7,000 hy -1 and inhalation dose coefficient. The ingestion dose was estimated from the consumption of water by children and adults as 75 Ly -1 and 50 Ly -1 with dose coefficients of 5.9 nSvBq -1 and 3.5 nSvBq -1 respectively (International Commision on Radiological Protection ICRP 72). [10] Assuming the proportion of these groups in the population to be 0.3, and 0.65, the weighted estimate of consumption is about 60 Ly -1 . The dose due to inhalation and ingestion are calculated by the following equation (2 and 3).




  Results Top


The radon concentration in different types of water samples was estimated using radon emanometry in the Mysore city. Radon concentration varies from below detection limit (BDL) to 643.9 BqL -1 with a median of 15.8 BqL -1 . Distribution of 222 Rn activity in different types of water samples are tabulated in [Table 1]. Lake water and river water have a radon concentration with median of 0.1 BqL -1 and 0.31 BqL -1 respectively, which is below the quoted value of 0.4 BqL -1 by World Health Organization (WHO). Low radon concentrations are observed in tap and river water due to lack of major contact with radon emanating mineral material and also by aeration of radon gas to the atmosphere. Hence, the activity concentration of radon found in surface water is several orders of magnitude lower than the groundwater. [11],[12] About 17% of the bore well samples are less than permissible limit of (300 pCiL -1 ) 11.1 BqL -1 , which is prescribed by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and more than 80% of the samples are above the 11.1 Bq L -1 as shown in [Figure 2]. [13] Majority of the population uses the ground water like bore well water for the daily activities and drinking purpose. Compared to an Indian average, radon concentration in the 40% of the samples are within limit of 4-40 BqL -1 . The measured values of radon activity in the study area are comparatively higher than the other neighbor districts like Bangalore and Mangalore. In Bangalore the radon concentration in ground water varies from 5.3 BqL -1 to 283.4 BqL -1 with a median of 87 BqL -1 and in coastal Karnataka (Mangalore) it varies from 0.91-15.86 BqL -1 . [14],[15] The distribution of 222 Rn activity in different types of water samples in geometric mean is shown in [Figure 3]. It is evident from the [Figure 3], that the highest radon concentration observed in bore wells water than the surface water. The highest radon concentration of 643.9 BqL -1 observed in the Bandipalya village located behind the Chamundi hill is surrounded by granite rocks. Previous studies on soil and rock samples at Chamundi hill show highest concentrations of uranium and thorium radionuclides. As granite rock contains high radon concentrations, when ground water originates from granite formations radionuclides leach out with ground water. Due to this reason, the highest radon concentrations in bore well water samples have been observed. [6],[16],[17] The study area contains metabasalt-amygdaloidal, pillowed and meta-ultramafites means Dharwar super group granites and pink granite of Chamundi hill, which have an average uranium content of 3.0 ppm. [12],[18] These granites are rich in radium and potassium radioactive elements. The bore wells dug up to a depth of about 30-92 m bgl, [19] the contact between water and the rocks in the drilled wells are responsible for the highest radon concentration. The result is correlated with similar work done at Extremadura, Spain having highest radon concentration of 1168 BqL -1 in ground water due to granitic and pre-cambrain ignesous bedrock. [20]
Figure 2: Distribution of radon concentration in Bore well

Click here to view
Figure 3: Distribution of radon concentration in water expressed in Geometric mean

Click here to view
Table 1: Statistical distribution of 222Rn activity (BqL−1) in different types of water

Click here to view


The dose was estimated due to 222 Rn through the ingestion and inhalation of water for the human population. Inhalation dose varies from BDL to 1.62 μSvy-1 for adults. Ingestion dose varies from BDL to 0.284 and BDL to 0.113 μSvy-1 for children and adult respectively. The effective dose for an adult is found to vary from BDL to 1.76 μSvy-1 is tabulated in [Table 2].
Table 2: 222Rn activity (BqL−1) in water and the corresponding dose

Click here to view


The estimated effective dose for an adult is very small compared to 100 μSvy-1 recommended by WHO. [12]


  Conclusion Top


The 222 Rn concentrations in 80% of the bore well water samples are higher than the 11.1 BqL -1 prescribed by the EPA. But radon concentration is found to be less in surface water and tap water. Radon concentration in 40% of the bore well water samples are in the range of 4-40 BqL -1 . Consequently, the ingestion dose to the children, adult and the effective dose was found to be with a mean of 0.026, 0.01 and 0.162 μSvy-1 respectively, which is less than the 100 μSvy-1 as recommended by WHO.


  Acknowledgments Top


This work has been carried out under the DAE, BRNS project. The authors thankful to the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India for extending financial support for the present study. The author thank to Dr. A. Chandrashekara for providing laboratory facility at BARC, Yelawala, Mysore.

 
  References Top

1.Smetanova I, Holy K, Mullerova M, Polaskova A. The effect of meteorological parameters on radon concentration in borehole air and water. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2010;283:101-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Chandrashekara MS, Sannappa J, Paramesh L. Studies on atmospheric electrical conductivity related to radon and its progeny concentrations in the lower atmosphere at Mysore. Atmos Environ 2006;40:87-95.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Singh J, Singh H, Singh S, Bajwa BS. Estimation of uranium and radon concentration in some drinking water samples of Upper Siwaliks, India. Environ Monit Assess 2009;154:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Choubey VM, Bartarya SK, Ramola RC. Radon variations in an active landslide zone along the Pindar River, in Chamoli District, Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, India. Environ Geol 2005;47:745-50.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Amrani D, Cherouati DE. Health effects from 222 Ra in drinking water in Algiers. J Radiol Prot 1999;19:275-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Shashikumar TS, Ragini N, Chandrashekara MS, Paramesh L. Studies on radon in soil, its concentration in the atmosphere and gamma exposure rate around Mysore city, India. Curr Sci India 2008;94:1180-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Ramakrishnan M, Swami Nath J. Early Precambrian supracrustals of southern Karnataka. Geological Survey of India, 1981;112:23-38.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Raghavayya M, Iyengar MA, Markose PM. Estimation of 226 Ra concentration by emanometry. Bull Rad Protect 1980;3:11.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.UNSCEAR. Exposures from Natural Radiation Sources. Annex B, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. New York, United Nation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2000. p. 84-156.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.ICRP. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Age-dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides: Part 5. Compilation of Ingestion and Inhalation Dose Coefficients. Annals of the ICRP 26 (1). Publication 72. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1996. p. 1-91.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Schmidt A, Christina E Stringer, Haferkorn U, Schubert M. Quantification of groundwater discharge into lakes using 222 Ra as naturally occurring tracer. Environ Geol 2009;56:855-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Radiological aspects, 3 rd ed., Vol. 1, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 1-494.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.EPA. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register; US 1999. p. 59246-94.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Shivprasad NG, Nagaiah N, Ashok GV, Mahesh HM. Radiation dose from dissolved radon in portable waters of the Bangalore environment, South India. Int J Environ Stud 2007;64:83-92.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Rajashekara KM, Narayana Y, Siddappa K. 222 Rn concentration in ground water and river water of coastal Karnataka. Radiat Meas 2007;42:472-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Dillon ME, Carter GL, Arora R, Kahn B. Radon concentrations in ground water of the Georgia Piedmont. Health Phys 1991;60:226-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Otwoma D, Mustapha AO. Measurement of 222 Rn concentration in Kenyan groundwater. Health Phys 1998;74:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Divakara Rao V, Aswathanarayana U, Qureshy MN. Trace element geochemistry of parts of the closepet granite, Mysore State, India. Mineral Mag 1972;38:678-86.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Farooqi MA, Najeeb Md K. Ground water information booklet, Mysore District, Karnataka. Ground water exploration by C.G.W.B: Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India; 2009. p. 1-24.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Galán López M, Martín Sánchez A. Present status of 222 Rn in groundwater in Extremadura. J Environ Radioact 2008;99:1539-43.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Study Area
Materials and Me...
Results
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2648    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded481    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal