|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 110-114
Efficiency of high-purity germanium detector at characteristic gamma energies of 198Au and 58Co and covariance analysis
Imran Pasha1, B Rudraswamy1, E Radha2, V Sathiamoorthy2
1 Department of Physics, Bangalore University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Indira Gandhi Center for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||20-Jun-2018|
|Date of Decision||20-Jul-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||23-Aug-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||19-Nov-2018|
Dr. B Rudraswamy
Department of Physics, Bangalore University, Bengaluru - 560 056, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Naturally occurring 197Au and 58Ni foils were subjected to the neutron irradiation by placing them in a dry tube-I of Kalpakkam Mini reactor to produce gamma emitting 198Au and 58Co nuclear reaction products. The efficiency study of high-purity germanium detector corresponding to characteristic gamma energies 0.4118 and 0.8107 MeV of 198Au and 58Co was carried out by the methods of calibration of 152Eu and covariance.
Keywords: Covariance, efficiency, high-purity germanium, Kalpakkam mini reactor
|How to cite this article:|
Pasha I, Rudraswamy B, Radha E, Sathiamoorthy V. Efficiency of high-purity germanium detector at characteristic gamma energies of 198Au and 58Co and covariance analysis. Radiat Prot Environ 2018;41:110-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Pasha I, Rudraswamy B, Radha E, Sathiamoorthy V. Efficiency of high-purity germanium detector at characteristic gamma energies of 198Au and 58Co and covariance analysis. Radiat Prot Environ [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 27];41:110-4. Available from: http://www.rpe.org.in/text.asp?2018/41/3/110/245796
| Introduction|| |
The calibration source 152Eu consists of many characteristic gamma lines. It can be used for the efficiency calibration of high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector as its activity is known. It is not possible to measure directly the efficiency of HPGe detector for known energies of characteristic gamma lines of nuclear reaction products as their activities are unknown. However, it can be known using the methods of calibration of 152Eu and covariance. This finds an application in knowing the nuclear reaction cross section of 198Au and 58Co.
Geraldo and Smith carried out work on least square methods and covariance matrix applied to the relative efficiency calibration of a Ge (Li) detector. Geraldo and Smith, carried out work on covariance analysis and fitting of germanium gamma-ray detector efficiency calibration data. Vidmar carried out work on EFFTRAN-A monte carlo efficiency transfer code for gamma-ray spectrometry. Jose et al., carried out work on the estimation of radioactive nobal gas activity in Fast Breeder Test Reactor (FBTR)-A simple method of calibration of HPGe detector. Shivashankaret al. carried out work on measurement and covariance analysis or reaction cross section for 58Ni(n, p) 58 Co relative to cross section for the formation of 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of 232Th and 238U at effective neutron energies En = 5.89, 10.11 and 15.87 MeV. Sheelaet al., carried out work on the efficiency of HPGe detector at characteristic gamma energies of 58Co and115m In in the reactions 59Co(n, 2n) 58Co and 115In(n, nI)115m In respectively. Further, they carried out the covariance analysis.
In the present study, the efficiency study of HPGe detector corresponding to characteristic gamma energies 0.4118 and 0.8107 MeV of 198Au and 58Co was carried out by the methods of calibration of 152Eu and covariance.
Naturally occurring foils 197Au and 58Ni with 99.85% purity procured from Alfa Aesar, USA, have been irradiated with neutrons consisting of spectrum of energies each with 3 h time by placing in dry Tube-I location of Kalpakkam Mini reactor to obtain nuclear reactions 197Au(n,γ) 198Au and 58Ni(n, p) 58Co. The obtained products 198Au and 58Co are capable to emit gamma with characteristic energies 0.4118 and 0.8107 MeV respectively. Their gamma spectra have been measured using p-type co-axial vertical HPGe detector of Dounreay Stakeholder Group make available at FBTR laboratory, IGCAR. The resolution of the detector is 1.8 keV at 1332.5 keV. The measured spectra are shown in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. The measured spectrum of calibration source 152Eu is shown in [Figure 3]. The point source 152Eu capsulated in a thin disc of araldite. The analysis of the spectral data has been done both with softwares of APTEC Engineering Ltd., Canada and GENIE-2000 Canberra Industries Inc., Meriden, USA.
| Results and Discussion|| |
Efficiency calibration of high-purity germanium for 152Eu
The full energy peak efficiency of HPGe detector was measured by considering nine gamma-ray energies (Ei, 1≤i ≤9) of 152Eu source. The source in our experiment was placed 8 cm from the detector. Hence, the correction factor kc due to coincidence summing effect was estimated using Monte Carlo simulation code EFFTRAN., The source was procured on March 1, 1999 with initial activity A0 was 45500 Bq. The efficiency ε(Eγ) of detector is given by.
Where Eγ is γ energy, C is counts obtained from the measured 152Eu gamma spectrum, Iγ is γ abundance, T½ is half-life (13.517 ± 0.014y), t is time elapsed between source and detector calibrations (17.92y). The decay data Iγ at each of the mentioned energies and T½ are retrieved from ENSDF data sets maintained by National Nuclear Data Center. The input data and the obtained detector efficiency ε(Eγ) at each of the gamma ray energy of 152Eu are listed in [Table 1]. The comparison of the detector efficiencies with and without correction factor due to coincidence summing effect is shown in [Figure 4].
|Figure 4: Detector efficiency with and without coincidence summing correction|
Click here to view
Covariance analysis for 152Eu
The uncertainty (Δεi in efficiency εi ranging from ε1(Eγ1) to ε9 (Eγ9) is obtained using the following relation.
where ΔCi, ΔIγi ΔA0i and Δλi are partial uncertainties (ekr) in Ci, Ii, AOi and λi respectively.
ekr is obtained with the following relation.
Where k = 1, 2,….9 corresponds to γ energies of 152Eu and r is attribute with 1≤r≤4.
The obtained values of Δεi and ekr are shown in [Table 2].
The microcorrelation matrix Sij is shown in [Table 3].
The covariance matrix Vεij is obtained with the following relation and the obtained values are shown in [Table 4].
Where δεkor Δεi and δxr are partial uncertainties in efficiency εk and partial uncertainty in xr(C, Iγ, Ao and T1/2), respectively.
The macro-correlation matrix Cεij due to Δεi and Δεj is obtained with the following relation and its values are shown in [Table 5].
Efficiency of high-purity germanium for198Au and58Co
The covariance matrix Vzij is obtained with the following relation and its values are shown in [Table 6].
The linear parametric matrix Z, design matrix A and fitting parameter matrix P are related by
Matrices Z, A and P can be obtained with the following relations.
Where 1 ≤ i ≤ 9, 1 ≤ k ≤ m, m = 2, 3.8.
The covariance matrix Vp can be obtained with the following relation.
A and Vp matrices can be generated for various m values lying between 2 and 8. In the present case, m = 5 is considered. Their values are shown in [Table 7] and [Table 8], respectively.
Fitting parameter matrix P is obtained with the following relation and its values are shown in [Table 9].
The least square condition states that the best estimate for parameter vector in the model is the one which minimizes the Chi-square statistics given by
The obtained x2 and values are 5.93 and 1.48 for m = 5, respectively.
The obtained values for m = 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 are 63.4, 18.6, 3.8, 1.45, 0.29, and 0.568, respectively. The two values for m = 5 and 6 are closer to one. m = 5 was considered for further calculation as this was less than the other.
The design Ac, linear parametric Zc, covariance VZc, efficiency covariance Vεc, and correlation Cεc matrices. For 198Au (0.411802 MeV) and 58Co (0.810759 MeV) were obtained with the following relations.
The obtained values of εc, Vεc and Cεc are shown in the [Table 10].
|Table 10: Estimated parameters at two gamma energies of the activated foils|
Click here to view
| Conclusions|| |
The energy depended efficiency calibration of HPGe detector corresponding to characteristic gamma energies of 152Eu has been carried out. The fitting parameters have been estimated by Chi-square test. The efficiency corresponding to characteristic gamma energies 0.4118 and 0.8107 MeV of 198Au and 58Co nuclear reaction products of unknown activity has been estimated by the knowledge of fitting parameters and the corresponding covariance study has also been carried out.
Financial support and sponsorship
The research work was supported by DAE BRNS, Mumbai through a major research project (sanctioned No. 36 (6)/14/92/2014 BRNS/2727).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Geraldo LP, Smith DL. Least square methods and covariance matrix applied to the relative efficiency calibration of a Ge (Li) detector. Instit Pesqui Energeticas Nucl 1989;243:1-16.
Geraldo LP, Smith DL. Covariance analysis and fitting of germanium gamma-ray detector efficiency calibration data. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 1990;290:499-508.
Vidmar T. EFFTRAN-A Monte Carlo efficiency transfer code for gamma-ray spectrometry. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2005;550:603-8.
Jose MT, Baskar S, Meenakshisundaram V. Estimation of radioactive nobal gas activity in FBTR- A simple method of calibration of HPGe detector. Conference IRPA12, 3; 2008.
Shivashankar BS, Ganesan S, Naik H, Suryanarayana SV, Nair NS, Prasad KM. Measurement and covariance analysis or reaction cross section for 58
Ni (n, p) 58
Co relative to cross section for formation of 97
Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of 232
Th and 238
U at effective neutron energies En
=5.89, 10.11 and 15.87 MeV. Nucl Sci Eng 2014;179:423-33.
Sheela YS, Naik H, Prasad KM, Ganesan S, Nair NS, Suryanarayana SV. The efficiency and error covariance matrix of HPGe detector at characteristic gamma energies of reaction products 58
Co and 115
mIn in the Measurement of 59
Co (n, 2n) 58
Co Reaction Cross Section Relative to 15
In (n, n') 115
mIn. Internal Report, No.MU/Statistics/DAE-BRNS/2017/2; 12 March, 2017.
NuDat 2.7, Nudat 2.7 National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory; 2016. Available from: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/
. [Last accessed on 2018 May 04].
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9], [Table 10]
|This article has been cited by|
||Measurement of 67Zn(n,p)67Cu, 64Zn(n,2n)63Zn, 89Y(n,?)90mY and 89Y(n,2n)88Y reaction cross sections at the neutron energy of 14.54 MeV with covariance analysis
| ||Imran Pasha,Rudraswamy Basavanna,Santhi Sheela Yerranguntla,Saraswatula Venkata Suryanarayana,Haladhara Naik,Meghna Karkera,Radha Eswaran,Pandikumar Gurusamy,Sunitha Aladahalli Madegowda,Sachhidananda Hulihalli Basavalingappa |
| ||Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||93Nb(n,2n)92mNb, 93Nb(n,a)90mY and 92Mo(n,p)92mNb reactions at 14.78 MeV and covariance analysis
| ||Imran Pasha,Rudraswamy Basavanna,Santhi Sheela Yerranguntla,Saraswatula Venkata Suryanarayana,Meghna Karkera,Haladhara Naik,Manjunatha Prasad Karantha,Laxman Singh Danu,Saroj Bishnoi,Tarun Patel,Rajeev Kumar |
| ||Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|