

ORIGINAL ARTICLE 

Year : 2019  Volume
: 42
 Issue : 1  Page : 4756 


Lead nitrate loaded, novel claybased bricks as radiation shielding materials for building applications
Madhuri Dumpala
Department of Physics, Osmania University College for Women, Koti, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Date of Submission  04Jun2018 
Date of Decision  19Jul2018 
Date of Acceptance  19Mar2019 
Date of Web Publication  3Jun2019 
Correspondence Address: Madhuri Dumpala Department of Physics, Osmania University College for Women, Koti, Hyderabad  500 001, Telangana India
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  Check 
DOI: 10.4103/rpe.RPE_36_18
A new class of clay bricks designed, developed, and tested for their radiation shielding efficiency. The bricks were prepared using natural clay, lake clay, and lightweight clay and loaded with different concentrations of Pb (NO_{3})_{2}. The gammaray shielding parameters were measured for these bricks with a transmission type of good geometry setup and operated at 511 and 662 keV energies. The gammaray spectrometer consists of a 2“×2” NaI (Tl) detector, 8K multichannel analyzer. The ^{22}Na and ^{137}Cs point isotropic gammaray sources were used in this study. To evaluate the efficiency of these bricks, various shielding parameters, such as linear attenuation coefficient, mass attenuation coefficient, meanfree path, halfvalue layer and tenthvalue layer were calculated. The XCOM software was used to calculate these parameters theoretically, and both the experimental and theoretical values were compared, and they are in good agreement. These results suggest that the clay bricks prepared with the natural and lake clay attenuate more radiation than the lightweight clay bricks. It is also observed that the lightweight bricks prepared with the solutions with higher loadings of lead nitrate showing increased attenuation, this may be attributed to the reason that at higher loadings of LN, the porous gaps of lightweight bricks are being filled by the LN particles and contributed to the attenuation of radiation.
Keywords: Clay bricks, gammaray attenuation coefficient, radiation shielding materials, radiation shielding parameters
How to cite this article: Dumpala M. Lead nitrate loaded, novel claybased bricks as radiation shielding materials for building applications. Radiat Prot Environ 2019;42:4756 
How to cite this URL: Dumpala M. Lead nitrate loaded, novel claybased bricks as radiation shielding materials for building applications. Radiat Prot Environ [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 28];42:4756. Available from: http://www.rpe.org.in/text.asp?2019/42/1/47/259668 
Introduction   
Exposure to ionizing radiation, for longer times, is hazardous to human beings. Therefore, there is a need to develop new class of shielding materials, time to time, to protect them from direct exposure to the harmful radiation. One such requirement is to develop building materials with high radiation shielding efficiency for residential buildings. At the same time, the use of radioactive isotopes has been increasing, drastically, in the fields of medicine, industry, defense and in other applications.^{[1]} The exposure to radiation causes damage not only to the cells in living organisms but to the sensitive laboratory equipment as well. The effect of the radiation could be minimized by three common methods, namely (i) time, (ii) distance, and (iii) shielding. The most effective method among these for attenuation of radiation is shielding and measurement of these attenuation coefficients of materials was published by Hubbel.^{[2]}
The measurement of accurate values of photon interaction parameters, such as mass attenuation coefficients in materials, are required in solving different problems in radiation physics, radiation protection, radiation dosimetry, nuclear diagnostics (computerized tomography), nuclear medicine, gammaray fluorescence, shielding, security screening and research and development etc.^{[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8]} Gammaray attenuation measurements, compilations and calculations in different elements have been published.^{[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23]}
Understanding the influence of the radiation shielding is important in building materials. Heavy metals such as lead or tungsten are ideal materials to be used in radiation shielding. On the other hand, they cannot be used directly in building construction due to durability and also cost. The design of shielding material depends on various parameters like type and the cost of material and the facilities available. The clay brick is one of the main materials used in building construction, even though it is less effective shielding material than lead (Pb) and tungsten (W), for example, lead (Pb) and tungsten (W) compounds can be used for the shielding from X and γ rays directly or by adding some shielding materials. These materials have an important role in the development of shielding technology. Since clay bricks alone are not good shielding materials there is a need to improve the shielding properties of materials. Different loadings of lead (Pb) and tungsten (W) compounds were added to pure clay bricks to improve their shielding efficiency. The Pb (NO_{3})_{2} is also an alternative material that can be used as an aggregate in the clay brick to improve radiation shielding properties, those are presented in terms of mass attenuation coefficient (μ/ρ, linear attenuation (μ), meanfree path (MFP) (1/μ), halfvalue layer (HVL) (ln 2/μ) and tenthvalue layer (TVL) (ln 10/μ).
The mass attenuation coefficients of normal clay bricks^{[24],[25]} are around 10% lower than the theoretical mass attenuation coefficient of water for those energies (511–1333 kev). Hence, it is concluded that the normal clay brick is attenuating less than the water for the incident radiation. Hence, we test bricks loaded with different concentrations of lead nitrate for higher attenuation of incident radiation and studying the gammaray shielding parameters, which has become an important^{[26],[27],[28]} method to assess them.
A systematic study has been undertaken to develop claybased bricks with improved radiation protection and tested at the energies 511 and 662 keV. We are presenting these results of gammaray interactions with and without Pb (NO_{3})_{2} concentration clay bricks prepared with different types of clay by measuring gammaray shielding parameters at different photon energies.
Theory and computation
If matter is exposed to gamma radiation beam, the intensity of the beam will be attenuated as per the Beer–Lambert Law. The gammaray attenuation coefficient in a particular medium is measured by
I = Io e^{μt} (1)
Where, I and Io are the initial and final intensities of interacting photons, respectively. μ is linear attenuation coefficient of the sample and “t” is the thickness of a material.
A correction term, known as the “Buildup factor” (B) need to be incorporated in the above Equation 1 for any breach of conditions and hence, the Beer–Lambert Law now becomes I = Io Be^{μt}.^{[29]}
Then the buildup factor is given by
B = I/Ioe^{μt} (2)
Where “B” is buildup factor of the sample
The linear attenuation coefficient (μ) is given by
μ =1/t ln (Io/I) (3)
Linear attenuation coefficients are very apt for developing engineering applications. The density of absorber, which does not contain a unique value always, but it depends, to certain extent, on the physical state of the material. To eliminate this density dependency and to utilize the mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ which, if μ is in cm^{−1} and ρ is in g/cm^{3}, will be in the customary units of cm^{2}/g. The mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ is expressed as
μ/ρ =1/ρt 1n (Io/I) (4)
Where “t” is the sample thickness (cm), and “ρ” is material density (g/cm^{3}), Io and I are the net counts under the photopeak, without sample and with sample, respectively. Io and I were obtained for the same counting time and experimental conditions. Interpolations from tabulated theoretical values of the mass attenuation coefficients for clay bricks were obtained using XCOM.^{[30]}
An average distance traveled by a photon between successive interactions is known as MFP, and it is given by
MFP = 1/μ (5)
The material thickness that reduces the intensity of the photon beam to half of its original value is known as HVL a material. The HVL is represented by
HVL = ln 2/μ(6)
The material thickness that reduces the intensity of the photon beam to onetenth of its original value is known as TVL a material. The TVL is represented by
TVL = ln 10/μ (7)
Materials and Methods   
In the present study, clay was collected from different geographical locations, sources and the bricks were made with different concentrations of lead nitrate loading. These clay bricks were prepared with water, collected from different sources.
Materials used
The following types of clay materials were used in the present study: (a) natural clay which is used in preparing normal clay bricks, (b) lake clay was collected from lake at near pochampally village, and (c) lightweight clay. The lightweight clay contains natural clay, fly ash and husk, and the ratio is 4:2:1, respectively. The groundwater from different sources was collected and stored in clean bottles for mixing clay. AR grade of lead nitrate (Pb [NO_{3}]_{2}) compound was purchased from Hychem Laboratories, Hyderabad, India.
Preparation methods
Different concentrations of lead nitrate solutions are prepared in the following method. Six liters of water were taken in a beaker and heated up to 70°C. At this temperature, the lead nitrate was added to water and stirred thoroughly for uniform mixing. In this way, different concentrations of lead nitrate solutions were prepared for making clay brick and they are as follows:
 LNC00^{th} concentration prepared without any lead nitrate compound (LNC).
 LNC11^{st} concentration prepared with 94 g of LNC diluted in 6 L of water
 LNC22^{nd} concentration prepared with 188 g of LNC diluted in 6 L of water
 LNC33^{rd} concentration prepared with 375 g of LNC diluted in 6 L of water
 LNC44^{th} concentration prepared with 750 g LNC diluted in 6 L of water
 LNC55^{th} concentration prepared with 1.5 kg LNC diluted in 6 L of water
 LNC66^{th} concentration prepared with 3 kg LNC diluted in 6 L of water
 LNC77^{th} concentration prepared with 6 kg of LNC diluted in 6 L of water.
The clay bricks were prepared with different concentrations of lead nitrate solutions separately as mentioned above. A set of four bricks were prepared for each type of solution.
The density of the clay bricks is measured as
Density = mass/volume
The mass of the brick is measured with electronic balance and the volume calculated as
Volume of a brick = length × width × height (l × h × w)
The error in measuring the density is <2%.
Experimental
Different shielding parameters were determined using gammaray source and transmission experiments in narrow beam geometry set up^{[25]} as shown in [Figure 1]. In these experimental methods, fairly good amount of thick lead sheet was used as shielding around the source and the detector to prevent detection of scattered radiation from surroundings. For the low energy measurements, the probability of coherent scattering interactions is relatively high and so very good collimation is required to reduce the contribution of Rayleigh scattered photons reaching the detector. A tight collimation reduces the absolute detection efficiency so that high activity sources must be employed, that is around 10 mCi strength. At higher energies, the probability of elastic scattering becomes much smaller and so scattered radiation is less important which reduces the need for such close collimation quantify higher energies. Furthermore, Compton scattering would lead to scattered component. Therefore, source strengths in the range 10–20 μCi were found to be adequate for the higher energy measurements. The radioactive sources of strength around 10 μCi were procured from BRIT, Mumbai, India, and details of the radioactive sources are given in [Table 1].  Figure 1: Block diagram of the experimental setup. S: Source, D: Detector, T: Target, Slit diameters: a: 4 mm, b: 10 mm. Length of the collimators: L_{1: }8 cm, L_{2: }5 cm
Click here to view 
A NaI (Tl) crystal detector of size 2“×2” with the energy resolution of 8% at the 662 keV and 8K multichannel analyzer plugincard were used with associated electronics to measure the pulseheight of gammaradiations emanated by radioactive sources. The densities of the clay bricks were calculated and summarized in the [Table 2].  Table 2: Densities of the clay bricks for different thicknesses and concentrationsa
Click here to view 
Elemental analysis of the prepared samples was done by using EDAX (measured with Carl Zeiss EVO 15, scanning electron microscope). The percentage of elemental compositions of the investigated clay bricks are given in [Table 3].  Table 3: Percentage of various elemental compositions of clay bricks under study
Click here to view 
For each sample, counts were taken in the following sequence, background, no sample, sample, sample, no sample, and so on.^{[28]} Different parts of the sample are exposed to the beam. The counting sequence was continued in most cases until counting statistics contributed <0.5% error. The errors in the present investigations are due to (i) counting statistics, (ii) nonuniformity of the sample, (iii) density measurements, and (iv) scattered radiation reaching the detector within the accepted maximum angle of scattering. In the present investigation, this angle was around 3° and the error is due to this factor was about 0.3%. The counting statistics were such that the error is <0.5%. The fractional error arising due to nonuniformity of the sample was estimated to be in the order of 0.2%. The error in the density measurement is <2%. After considering the error due to density, the overall error in the presented work is <2.82% (that means the consolidated error of my experimental calculations are <2.82%). The theoretical gammaray shielding parameters of prepared samples were estimated by using mixture rule.
Results and Discussions   
In the present work, the results of the theoretical and experimental values of different radiation shielding parameters (mass attenuation, linear attenuation, MFP, HVL, TVL and Buildup factor) for different type clay bricks (natural, lake and lightweight) with different concentrations of Pb (No_{3})_{2} loadings, at 511 and 662 keV energies were presented and the same was summarized as [Table 4] and [Table 5], respectively.  Table 4: Radiation shielding parameters in different types of clay bricks at 511 keV energy
Click here to view 
 Table 5: Radiation shielding parameters in different types of clay bricks at 662 keV energy
Click here to view 
Mass attenuation coefficients
With the exponential increase of lead nitrate concentration in clay bricks, it was observed that there was a slow increase in the mass attenuation coefficients and it is decreased with increasing of photon energy, which is presented in [Figure 2]a and [Figure 3]a. There is good agreement between the theoretical and experimental values of mass attenuation coefficients. From the graph, the mass attenuation coefficients of different type clay bricks (natural, lake, and lightweight clay) are nearly equal at all concentrations. Therefore, the values of mass attenuation coefficients are not changing with the clay type used in the present study.  Figure 2: Variation of various shielding parameters of the clay bricks under study at 511 keV energy: (a) Mass attenuation coefficients (b) Linear attenuation coefficients (c) Meanfree path (d) halfvalue layer (e) tenthvalue layer (f) Buildup factor. N9 cm: Natural clay brick with 9 cm, Th: Theoritical value, N7 cm: Natural clay brick with 7 cm, L9 cm: Lake clay brick with 9 cm, L7 cm: Lake clay brick with 7 cm, LT9 cm: Lightweight clay brick with 9 cm, LT7 cm: Lightweight clay brick with 7 cm
Click here to view 
 Figure 3: Variation of various shielding parameters of the clay bricks under study at 662 keV energy: (a) Mass attenuation coefficients (b) Linear attenuation coefficients (c) meanfree path (d) halfvalue layer (e) tenthvalue layer (f) buildup factor. N9 cm: Natural clay brick with 9 cm, Th: Theoritical value, N7 cm: Natural clay brick with 7 cm, L9 cm: Lake clay brick with 9 cm, L7 cm: Lake clay brick with 7 cm, LT9 cm: Lightweight clay brick with 9 cm, LT7 cm: Lightweight clay brick with 7 cm
Click here to view 
At LNC7 concentration the mass attenuation coefficients of different type clay brick at 511 and 662 keV are nearly equal to the theoretical value of mass attenuation coefficients of LNC and it is 0.130 and 0.098 g/cm^{2}, respectively. For 9 cm thickness, the experimental mass attenuation coefficients of lead nitrate clay brick at 511 and 662 keV are 0.119 and 0.097 g/cm^{2}, respectively.
Linear attenuation coefficients
Linear attenuation coefficient increases with the increasing of lead nitrate concentration. [Figure 2]b and [Figure 3]b show how the linear attenuation coefficients vary with the increase of lead nitrate concentrations in the clay bricks. From the graphs, it is clear that, for all concentrations, the linear attenuation coefficients of natural and lake clay bricks are nearly equal but for the lightweight clay brick deviated from them. Comparatively natural and lake clay brick, lightweight clay brick have low density and the linear attenuation is directly proportional to density.
Meanfree path
The variation of MFP values of different types of clay bricks is shown in [Figure 2]c and [Figure 3]c. From the figure, it is clear that the MFP decreases with the increasing of lead nitrate concentration in clay bricks. The linear attenuation is inversely proportional to MFP.
Halfvalue layer
HVL decreases with the increasing of lead nitrate concentration in clay bricks, as shown in [Figure 2]d and [Figure 3]d.
Tenthvalue layer
From [Figure 2]e and [Figure 3]e, it is clear that the TVL decreases with the increasing of lead nitrate concentration in clay bricks.
Buildup factor
Buildup factor were calculated as per the formula^{[29]} and shown as [Figure 2]f and [Figure 3]f.
Conclusions   
A new class of claybased bricks for building material was developed with enhanced radiation shielding properties. These clay bricks were prepared with clay collected from different sources, loaded with different concentrations of LN, were studied for their radiation shielding efficiency. These bricks showed enhanced radiation shielding properties. Experimental measurements were taken using good geometry setup at energies 511 and 662 keV to measure various radiation shielding parameters. The mass attenuation coefficients of different types bricks prepared using natural, lake clay and lightweight bricks are nearly equal at all concentrations. Therefore, it is concluded that the mass attenuation coefficient is not changing with the type of clay used. The Linear attenuation coefficients of natural and lake clay bricks at all concentrations are nearly equal but lightweight clay deviated with natural and lake clay bricks at all concentrations. MFP, HVL and TVL of natural and lake clay bricks at all concentrations are equal, lightweight clay brick is deviated from them at all concentrations. Meanfree path, HVL and TVL are reciprocal of linear attenuation coefficients. Among all, the clay bricks prepared with LNC7 using natural and lake clay showed low HVL and TVL values and high mass attenuation values, indicating that these bricks demonstrated improved shielding properties and are suitable for radiation shielding applications. It is observed that for the lightweight clay bricks are not suggestible for radiation shielding as they show poor radiation shielding properties compared to the brick prepared using natural and lake clay, in spite of the fact that at higher loadings of LN in lightweight clay bricks, the radiation shielding has been increased, this may be due to the reason that at higher loadings of LN in the lightweight clay bricks, the porous gaps of lightweight bricks are being filled by the LN particles and contributed to the attenuation of radiation from LNC3 (third concentrations) onwards. Therefore, the shielding parameters measured in this study, reveals that the bricks prepared with natural and lake clay showed higher attenuation compare to lightweight clay bricks.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References   
1.  Jackson DF, Hawkes DJ. Xray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixture. Phys Rep 1981;70:169. 
2.  Hubbell JH. Photon Cross Section, Attenuation Coefficients and Energy Absorption Coefficient for 10 keV100 GeV. NSRDS. National Bureau of Standards; 1969. p. 29. 
3.  Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973;46:101622. 
4.  Brooks RA, Di Chiro G. Beam hardening in Xray reconstructive tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976;21:3908. 
5.  Parker P. European seminar on computer tomography in oncology. Br Med Bull 1980;36:289. 
6.  Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, TerPogossian MM. Attenuation coefficients of various body tissues, fluids, and lesions at photon energies of 18 to 136 keV. Radiology 1975;117:57383. 
7.  Jackson DF, Foster J, Gilboy WB, Kouris K, Spyrou NM. International conference on machine aided analysis. Inst Phys Conf Srt 1979;44:95. 
8.  Kouris K, Spyrou NM. Usefulness of photon mass attenuation coefficients in elemental analysis. Nucl Instrum and Methods 1978;153:477. 
9.  Akkut I, Mavi B, Akkut A, Basyigit C, Killincarslan HA. Study on Z dependence of partial and total mass attenuation coefficients. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2005;94:379. 
10.  Angelone M, Espostito A, Chiti M, Gentile A. Measurements of mass attenuation coefficients for four mixtures using Xrays from 13 keV to 40 keV. Radiat Phys Chem 2001;61:547. 
11.  Baltas H, Celik S, Cevik U, Yanmaz E. Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers for MgB2 superconductor using Xray energies. Radiat Meas 2007;42:55. 
12.  Icelli O, Erzeneoglu S, Boncukcuoglu R. Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients of some boron compounds and the trommel sieve waste in the energy range 15.746–40.930 keV. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2003;78:203. 
13.  Icelli Q, Erzeneoglu S, Boncukcuoglu R. Experimental studies on measurements of mass attenuation coefficients of boric acid at different concentration. Ann Nucl Energy 2004;31:97. 
14.  Icelli O, Erzeneoglu S. The mass attenuation coefficients in some vanadium and nickel compound. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2004;88:519. 
15.  Shivaramu, Ramprasath V. Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption and energy dependence of some thermo luminescent dosimetric compound. Nucl Instrum Methods B 2000;168:294. 
16.  Singh K, Singh H, Sharma G, Gerward L, Khanna A, Kumar R, et al. Gammaray shielding properties of Cao–Sro–B2 O3 glasses. Radiat Phys Chem 2005;72:225. 
17.  Turgut U, Buyukkasap E, Simsek O, Ertugrul M. Xray attenuation coefficients of Fe compounds in the Kedge region at different energies and the validity of the mixture rule. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2005;92:143. 
18.  Conner AL, Atwater HF, Plassmann EH, McCrary JH. Gamma ray attenuation coefficient measurements. Phys Rev A 1970;1:539. 
19.  Polat R, Budak G, Gurol A, Karabulut A, Ertugrul M. Kshell absorption jump factors for the elements Ag, Cs, Ba and La derived from new mass attenuation coefficient measurements using EDXRF technique. Radiat Meas 2005;39:409. 
20.  Hubbell JH. Photon mass attenuation and energyabsorption coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 1982;33:1269. 
21.  Chantler CT. Theoretical form factor, attenuation and scattering tabulation for Z=192 from E=110 eV to E=0.41.0 MeV. J Phys Chem Ref Data 1995;24:71. 
22.  Alam MN, Miah MM, Chowdhury MI, Kamal M, Ghose S, Rahman R. Attenuation coefficients of soils and some building materials of Bangladesh in the energy range 2761332 keV. Appl Radiat Isot 2001;54:9736. 
23.  Awadallah MI, Imran MM. Experimental investigation of gamma ray attenuation in Jordanian building materials using HP Gespectrometer. J Environ Radioact 2007;94:129. 
24.  Medhat ME. Gamma ray attenuation coefficients of some building materials available in Egypt. Ann Nucl Energy 2009;36:849. 
25.  Maduri D, Roy BR, Esther Kalpana D, Rani D, Nageshwara Rao AS. Gamma ray attenuation measurements in clay bricks at 1173 and 1333 keV. Int J Eng Res 2015;3:S7. 
26.  Ali AM. Determination of attenuation properties for some building materials by MCN simulation. Arab J Nucl Sci Appl 2015;48:33. 
27.  Sayyed MN, Lakshminarayana G, Kityk IV, Mahdi MA. Evaluation of shielding parameters for heavy metal fluoride based Tellurite – Rich glasses for gamma ray shielding applications. Radiat Phys Chem 2017;33:139. 
28.  Singh AK, Singh RK, Sharma B, Tyagi AK. Characterization and biocompatibility studies of leadfree Xray shielding polymer composite for healthcare applications. Radiat Phys Chem 2017;9:138. 
29.  Berger MJ, Hubbell JH. XCOM: Photon cross sections on a personal computer. NBSIR 1987;87:3597. 
30.  Sayyed MI, AIZaatreh MY, Dong MG, Zaid MH, Matori KA, Tekin HO. A comprehensive study of the energy absorption and exposure buildup factors of different bricks for gamma – Rays shielding. Results Phys 2017;7:252833. 
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
